<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teacher Wins Back Tenure After Class Votes Out Boy With Autism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/06/11/portillo-tenure/3614/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/06/11/portillo-tenure/3614/</link>
	<description>Developmental Disability News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:13:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deweysghost</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/06/11/portillo-tenure/3614/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>deweysghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilityscoop.com/?p=3614#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Ms.  Portillo should be fired.  If she was allowed back into my school as an administrator, I would be on her like a hawk.  As an educator, she is pathetic.  Smiling in the video like she was redeemed.  As a human, she is a heartless coward.  Treating a 5 year old like that due to her own inadequate skills of coping.  Having had students cuss, spit, and swing at me, I know the temptation to de-humanize them.  But, I don&#039;t, because they deserve dignity as all people do.  What a disgusting waste of tax-payer dollars to keep her and even worse to give her the tenure back.  Fire her on the spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms.  Portillo should be fired.  If she was allowed back into my school as an administrator, I would be on her like a hawk.  As an educator, she is pathetic.  Smiling in the video like she was redeemed.  As a human, she is a heartless coward.  Treating a 5 year old like that due to her own inadequate skills of coping.  Having had students cuss, spit, and swing at me, I know the temptation to de-humanize them.  But, I don&#8217;t, because they deserve dignity as all people do.  What a disgusting waste of tax-payer dollars to keep her and even worse to give her the tenure back.  Fire her on the spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdang</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/06/11/portillo-tenure/3614/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>fdang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilityscoop.com/?p=3614#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Before a child can be move from one class setting to a more restrictive setting, the school has to first use their resources including an aide. Whether a student remain in a class or not should be based on the students needs, not a popularity contest. Disabled individuals are usually discriminated against when they enter into the mainstream of any community. Any adult working with a disabled individual, especially in a teaching role, has a duty to teach the non disabled students to include the disabled student in the classroom.  This is what IDEA. 504. and ADA is trying to stress. To have a popularity contest, by having the student vote whether a disabled student remain in call is teaching discrimination against a person who is different. A person who has a disability is not having that disability by choice. Should that teacher be fired...no...I thing she needs to be educated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before a child can be move from one class setting to a more restrictive setting, the school has to first use their resources including an aide. Whether a student remain in a class or not should be based on the students needs, not a popularity contest. Disabled individuals are usually discriminated against when they enter into the mainstream of any community. Any adult working with a disabled individual, especially in a teaching role, has a duty to teach the non disabled students to include the disabled student in the classroom.  This is what IDEA. 504. and ADA is trying to stress. To have a popularity contest, by having the student vote whether a disabled student remain in call is teaching discrimination against a person who is different. A person who has a disability is not having that disability by choice. Should that teacher be fired&#8230;no&#8230;I thing she needs to be educated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twinkie1cat</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/06/11/portillo-tenure/3614/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>twinkie1cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilityscoop.com/?p=3614#comment-367</guid>
		<description>She was unemployed for a year.  That is a huge punishment.  She deserved it. 

Tenure only comes after a substantial amount of work and often a lot of conformity, fake smiles, overlooking ethics violations in those who are in power, and, often, kissing up to administrators.  She does not deserve to lose her tenure. That would make her vulnerable to firing for no reason at all--like a principal who did not want white people working at her all black school did to me.  

She is probably a pretty good teacher, but she made a bad mistake.  I hope she was also required to take some special education methods and special needs behavior management courses. All regular teachers should be required to. I would have held her to a higher standard if she was a special education teacher because if she was she would have known better.  We have to be smart and well educated to do special ed. properly.  But a regular teacher does not have our background or training.  They are generalists.  Autistics are difficult even for special education teachers. Some us have the gift for working with them and some don&#039;t. For that reason inclusion should be done carefully. When I read the original article I read that he was still being evaluated for autism, so the environment and structure (His Least Restrictive Environment) he needed was not in place. The teacher was out of field. 

Therefore, this time I would give her back her tenure.  However, if she is ever mean to a student again, especially if she applies peer pressure in an inappropriate way, she should lose both her job and her certificate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was unemployed for a year.  That is a huge punishment.  She deserved it. </p>
<p>Tenure only comes after a substantial amount of work and often a lot of conformity, fake smiles, overlooking ethics violations in those who are in power, and, often, kissing up to administrators.  She does not deserve to lose her tenure. That would make her vulnerable to firing for no reason at all&#8211;like a principal who did not want white people working at her all black school did to me.  </p>
<p>She is probably a pretty good teacher, but she made a bad mistake.  I hope she was also required to take some special education methods and special needs behavior management courses. All regular teachers should be required to. I would have held her to a higher standard if she was a special education teacher because if she was she would have known better.  We have to be smart and well educated to do special ed. properly.  But a regular teacher does not have our background or training.  They are generalists.  Autistics are difficult even for special education teachers. Some us have the gift for working with them and some don&#8217;t. For that reason inclusion should be done carefully. When I read the original article I read that he was still being evaluated for autism, so the environment and structure (His Least Restrictive Environment) he needed was not in place. The teacher was out of field. </p>
<p>Therefore, this time I would give her back her tenure.  However, if she is ever mean to a student again, especially if she applies peer pressure in an inappropriate way, she should lose both her job and her certificate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgrogan36</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/06/11/portillo-tenure/3614/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>dgrogan36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilityscoop.com/?p=3614#comment-363</guid>
		<description>I must say that I am disappointed in the decision of the St. Luci Country School Board.  I believe the teacher in question should be allowed to return to her job in November (after her suspension is over) but on a probationary basis.  She should not receive her tenure without proving her worth.  This is just one of many reasons why students with disabilities that are no apparent on the surface end up dropping out of school.  Everyone deserves a second chance, but they must work for it and show improvement in judgement.  What exactly was she teaching these children by voting out a 5 year old?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that I am disappointed in the decision of the St. Luci Country School Board.  I believe the teacher in question should be allowed to return to her job in November (after her suspension is over) but on a probationary basis.  She should not receive her tenure without proving her worth.  This is just one of many reasons why students with disabilities that are no apparent on the surface end up dropping out of school.  Everyone deserves a second chance, but they must work for it and show improvement in judgement.  What exactly was she teaching these children by voting out a 5 year old?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
