<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey: Employers Remain Hesitant To Hire People With Disabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/11/05/employer-attitudes-ca/6059/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/11/05/employer-attitudes-ca/6059/</link>
	<description>Developmental Disability News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:23:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ethanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2009/11/05/employer-attitudes-ca/6059/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>ethanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilityscoop.com/?p=6059#comment-766</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot more to this story. When I was Exec of the NJ DD COUNci, we commissioed what happened to people with disabilities once employed. Two findings are particularlly relevant:

1. Supervisors were reluctant to point out weaknesses in the performance of employees with disabilities during their evaluations. As a result, they were denied the information needed to improve their performance.

2.Employees with disabilities were less likely to be included in on-the-job and after-work socialization. As a result, they were denied the informal learning that co-workers often share in those situations.

Neither of these issues get the attention needed to improve our job retention and advancement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot more to this story. When I was Exec of the NJ DD COUNci, we commissioed what happened to people with disabilities once employed. Two findings are particularlly relevant:</p>
<p>1. Supervisors were reluctant to point out weaknesses in the performance of employees with disabilities during their evaluations. As a result, they were denied the information needed to improve their performance.</p>
<p>2.Employees with disabilities were less likely to be included in on-the-job and after-work socialization. As a result, they were denied the informal learning that co-workers often share in those situations.</p>
<p>Neither of these issues get the attention needed to improve our job retention and advancement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
