<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expected Changes In DSM-V Leave Some Questioning Who’s Normal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2010/07/27/dsm-changes-normal/9528/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2010/07/27/dsm-changes-normal/9528/</link>
	<description>Developmental Disability News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmgillen</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2010/07/27/dsm-changes-normal/9528/comment-page-1/#comment-2791</link>
		<dc:creator>vmgillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilityscoop.com/?p=9528#comment-2791</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say the problem lies in the fact that these guys are the gatekeepers: you don&#039;t get anything based on need, only based on fitting the APA&#039;s criteria... so the profession&#039;s livelihood is dependent on broad diagnostic criteria... this is wrong. Read T. Szaas&#039;s work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the problem lies in the fact that these guys are the gatekeepers: you don&#8217;t get anything based on need, only based on fitting the APA&#8217;s criteria&#8230; so the profession&#8217;s livelihood is dependent on broad diagnostic criteria&#8230; this is wrong. Read T. Szaas&#8217;s work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazyrenowriter</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2010/07/27/dsm-changes-normal/9528/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>lazyrenowriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilityscoop.com/?p=9528#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>There are many new proposed diagnosies which are quite troubling.  While the recovery movement is making some small progress, the Psych doctors, who appear to be frightened of people recovering, continue to place bureaucratic obstacles in the way of recovery.  Having established themselves as a bureaucratic dictatorship, which refuses to admit to the possibility of other approaches, they become more frightening each year.  On the bright side, this may drive more people to Vibrational methods (which includes homeopathy, but is not limited to it) of healing.  But we could lose the 20 - 25% of psychiatry which is helpful, as they continue to lose credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many new proposed diagnosies which are quite troubling.  While the recovery movement is making some small progress, the Psych doctors, who appear to be frightened of people recovering, continue to place bureaucratic obstacles in the way of recovery.  Having established themselves as a bureaucratic dictatorship, which refuses to admit to the possibility of other approaches, they become more frightening each year.  On the bright side, this may drive more people to Vibrational methods (which includes homeopathy, but is not limited to it) of healing.  But we could lose the 20 &#8211; 25% of psychiatry which is helpful, as they continue to lose credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

