Print Print

Disability Programs Still Vulnerable After ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Deal

By

Text Size  A  A

Despite an agreement last week to avert the so-called “fiscal cliff,” experts say considerable uncertainty remains regarding the future of the nation’s disability programs.

The last-minute deal struck shortly after the new year rang in halted tax increases for many Americans but failed to address a series of sweeping federal budget cuts. Instead, lawmakers opted to put off a process known as sequestration for two months, meaning that deep cuts that were expected to take effect at this beginning of this year for nearly all government programs will be delayed until March.

While offering a temporary reprieve, advocates say that the move leaves the fate of countless programs benefiting people with disabilities in the balance, with further budget negotiations in Washington virtually inevitable to deal with the impending cuts and the nation’s debt ceiling.

“Everything is on the table,” said Marty Ford, director of public policy for The Arc. “The next three months will make a huge difference in the way our federal government addresses people with disabilities for years to come.”

Of utmost concern to Ford is the future of entitlement programs like Medicaid and Social Security. Though not subject to sequestration, advocates say the programs are vulnerable in any big budget deal that lawmakers may try to reach. Changes to these initiatives could be critical for people with disabilities, Ford said, with entitlement programs often making the difference between a person being able to live in the community or having no choice outside of institutional life.

Meanwhile, under sequestration, everything from special education to transportation, housing and health care programs serving people with disabilities are slated to be slashed in March in an effort to trim billions from the federal budget.

The two-month delay of sequestration means that less money will be chopped than was forecast last fall when more than $100 billion was expected to be cut, but how much is not entirely clear. Regardless, the effect of such significant spending reductions on people with disabilities would be severe, said Lindsay Jones, senior director for policy and advocacy at the Council for Exceptional Children.

“One of the major concerns is that these cuts are indiscriminate and across-the-board,” Jones said, noting that disability programs have already sustained significant cutbacks in recent years. “I think we have these two months to re-energize our membership and get them focused on how they can best explain their concerns to Congress.”

More in Politics »

Search Jobs

Post a Comment

Disability Scoop welcomes comments, but all submissions are moderated and will not appear until they are approved. Please keep your remarks brief and refrain from inserting links. In order to maintain a respectful dialogue, comments that are promotional, off-topic, unoriginal or those that contain offensive language or make personal attacks will not be published.

Comments (6 Responses)

  1. Thomas C. Wood_Salem_NH says:

    Of course they are vulnerable. One party wants them all eliminated per their social darwinism political agenda.

  2. Tacitus says:

    This is what happens when you vote for someone who campaigns on cutting taxes.

    EVEN WHEN IT’S A DEMOCRAT DOING IT THERE WILL STILL BE NO MONEY LEFT FOR SERVICES

    We have a two-party religion in this country. Time to de-convert. Vote Green.

  3. Tara Walker says:

    It’s a crying shame that those who can’t help themselves are being left out in the cold! Lord have mercy on this country! They need to quit sending so much money overseas and take care of their own!

  4. Tim says:

    So sad, After years of progress, we face the threat of loosing out to a budget deficit. I hope sense prevailes over ignorance for once in DC.

  5. Sandy Stoddard says:

    In stead of cutting people with disabilities they should cut out the benefits and pay the congressmen and senators receive when they leave office. They should have to fend for themselves like the rest of us when their terms are finished.

  6. Vickie Angell says:

    To shorthand disabled Veterans is an extreme dehumanization for the ones who have died so we can live freely. To steal monies from the helpless children who choose NOT to be born with disabilities however are here and struggle not only with expectations of to thrive/survive in an expected educated world is a disgraceful and shameful decision of our National (non-disabled) leaders. If anyone would feel the commitment to oppose this very neglecting and what I consider to the “place the child in a cage for show and tell” choice our government has ignorantly declared…Please email me at vangellwfubmc@gmail.com. We still have a chance to help these children live and lead educated and productive lives.

Copyright © 2008-2014 Disability Scoop, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Reprints and Permissions