Print Print

In Push For Community Living, States Offered Incentives

By

Text Size  A  A

In New Hampshire, Medicaid pays for in-home care for nearly all of its residents with developmental disabilities. For frail elders, the opposite is true. Most wind up in nursing homes.

To remedy this imbalance, New Hampshire is taking advantage of Affordable Care Act funding for a program aimed at removing existing barriers to providing long-term care in people’s homes and communities.

Known as the Balancing Incentive Payments Program, it is one of several ACA provisions designed to keep as many people as possible out of costly institutions. Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Ohio and Texas are also participating in the $3 billion incentive program.

According to a 2010 AARP survey, nine out of 10 older Americans said they would rather be cared for in their homes than in a nursing home. People with mental and physical disabilities, and those who represent them, also have pushed for community-based long-term care options and the ability to live independently in their homes.

States participating in the $3 billion program receive a higher federal match for all of their spending on home and community care through September 2015, provided they reduce the red tape and confusion that caretakers, elders and those with disabilities typically encounter when they attempt to find alternatives to nursing homes.

Provider of Last Resort

In 2010, nearly two-thirds of nursing home residents had their bills paid by Medicaid. Many low-income older people qualify for Medicaid before they enter a nursing home. But hundreds of thousands of higher-income people also end up in the Medicaid program after they deplete their own resources. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the average cost of nursing home care in 2010 was $6,235 per month.

States have had the option of providing alternatives to nursing homes under a Medicaid “waiver” program developed during the Reagan administration. A major impetus for the change was that Medicaid dollars can support nearly three older people or adults with physical disabilities in their homes for every one person in a nursing home, according to a study by AARP.

Progress has been made over the last 30 years. More people are able to remain in their homes every year. In fact, the use of nursing homes has declined in recent years, despite the growing ranks of the elderly. In 2010, 1.4 million Americans resided in nursing homes, a decline of 4 percent since 2005, according to the AARP study.

But nearly everyone agrees that not enough has been done to give people a choice about where they receive care. Part of the problem is a morass of regulatory barriers under the Medicaid program. The balancing incentives program could eliminate some of them.

Separate from the balancing incentives program, HHS recently published a long-awaited update to its community living waiver rules, with the goal of simplifying the waiver process and eligibility requirements so that more people can receive care outside of institutions. In general, said Matt Salo, director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, the federal government is “putting its foot on the accelerator to make more community-based services available.”

No Wrong Door

Under the balancing incentives program, states must create a so-called “no-wrong-door” approach for people looking for resources to help them keep their loved ones at home. Most people have no idea where to turn when the need for long-term care arises. To make sure people get access to the services they need, Medicaid agencies are charged with training all state and local social services organizations to help them apply. The state also works with hospital discharge personnel to make sure they inform patients about their options for care.

“In New Hampshire that means not turning them back out into the cold,” said Don Hunter, who heads the state balancing incentives program. “Don’t just give them a phone number. Make the appointments for them.”

The program also requires states to create a standardized set of eligibility assessments for everyone so that all of their needs can be met, no matter what their age or type of disability.

States must also provide an independent case manager for every person in need — one who does not have ties to a nursing home or any other type of health care service.

To qualify for the incentive program, states must have spent less than 50 percent of their Medicaid long-term care dollars on community-based care in 2009.

When the program began in 2011, New Hampshire was ahead of most other states. Nearly 50 percent of its spending was on home and community care. Today, community spending exceeds 55 percent, Hunter said.

Incentives for Change

National advocates for community-based care are watching New Hampshire because it has made huge strides in caring for people with developmental disabilities. At least 99 percent of them are receiving care in their homes and communities, far more than in other states. Many hope the state can make the same kind of progress for elders and adults with physical and behavioral disabilities.

But transferring those policies to older people may not be so easy. Doug McNutt, AARP associate state director for advocacy, says the challenges are very different for adults with disabilities and older people. “Family members have had an amazing effect. Parents [of kids with developmental disabilities] take it on as a mission and that mission doesn’t end when they’re 18. With elders, it’s not the same.”

Medicaid requires states to provide nursing home beds to those who need it. Waivers for community-based services are optional. The state can limit eligibility, total spending and geographic availability. Determining eligibility under a waiver can take two months. Eligibility for a nursing home is automatic.

New Hampshire’s long-term care waiver for community services is broader than the waiver in most other states. People don’t have to apply for multiple programs to get the services they need. But McNutt said the process needs to be faster. “Families are in crisis, and if there aren’t family members around, it’s even more likely you’ll end up in a nursing home.”

Another impediment to shifting more care to the community is that New Hampshire, like most other states, has a well-established nursing home industry. The owners of dozens of facilities who employ thousands of workers have a vested interest in making sure they have a steady stream of business.

That issue doesn’t exist for people with developmental disabilities. As the result of a lawsuit, New Hampshire in 1991 closed its only institution for people with cognitive impairment — the Laconia State School. As a result, there was no other option but to find home and community based services for its residents. “It was like lightning in a bottle,” McNutt said.

Still, state officials deserve credit for creating a smooth transition, said Sue Fox of the University of New Hampshire. “New Hampshire got ahead of the game and stayed ahead with the developmental disability population. Now the goal is to bring some of those same policies to aging and mental health,” she said.

Stateline is a nonpartisan, nonprofit news service of the Pew Charitable Trusts that provides daily reporting and analysis on trends in state policy.

More in Living »

Search Jobs

Post a Comment

Disability Scoop welcomes comments, but all submissions are moderated and will not appear until they are approved. Please keep your remarks brief and refrain from inserting links. In order to maintain a respectful dialogue, comments that are promotional, off-topic, unoriginal or those that contain offensive language or make personal attacks will not be published.

Comments (4 Responses)

  1. Brian Bishoff says:

    Having worked in the DD system in NH since 1993 , I’ll tell you it can be done and it is much better, though of course not perfect. Our funding levels are low and most people’s budgets haven’t changed for quite few years. It will be so awesome when elders have the same amount of freedom and be able to get support in their homes without a hassle. With baby boomers retiring in large numbers the pressure will be on. If nursing homes are smart they can start providing home based services.

  2. holly delph says:

    Having a independent care manager is a must. Too many of them are tied to the very homes they want your adult child in. Big profits are made off of the backs of the disabled. My coordinator calls it shared resourses when talking about group homes (institutions). Many of these group home are owned by contract groups such as Hope Network and Moka, Threshold, and Spectrum Community service that I was told by Community Mental Health that I had to use as care coordinators. They are non-profits that are very profitable. A lot of money is wasted on running their business. They have their superviors, their buildings, and a lot of their people who of yet I still can’t figure out what they are for. Just not a big fan of non-profits now a-days.
    Sincerely,
    Special needs mom in west michigan

  3. fairlady68 says:

    As a single 56 year old female with Asperger’s who is not likely to have family member support available by the time I need this kind of assistance, the topic of elder care is huge for me. I of course would prefer to be in my own home or a small group home than in the traditional nursing home. The concern of exploitation and abuse still remains…I once knew an elderly Russian-speaking lady (also with no relatives around) whose paid caregiver was a “friend” who exploited the Russian lady quite blatantly. The Russian lady felt trapped and unwilling to challenge her caregiver for fear of being left totally in the cold with poor English skills and no ability to care for herself. I don’t want that to happen to me. BTW thanks for switching your Captcha codes to numbers plus address or mailbox numbers. Much easier for me (and likely others with disabilities) to access than the Captchas with alphabet letters.

  4. marie camp says:

    This is definitely good news but we have to push harder than ever to achieve this goal. I believe this could work for every state if we all work together and keep pushing the system Living in VA you can’t give up the fight and you have to push each day to get your voice heard.

Copyright © 2008-2014 Disability Scoop, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Reprints and Permissions