Print Print

Voters With Special Needs Allegedly Disenfranchised


Text Size  A  A

Advocates are asking the Justice Department to ensure that people with disabilities are not illegally disenfranchised. (Thinkstock)

Advocates are asking the Justice Department to ensure that people with disabilities are not illegally disenfranchised. (Thinkstock)

Thousands of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are being illegally denied the right to vote, advocates say.

In a complaint filed Thursday with the U.S. Department of Justice, advocates with the Disability and Abuse Project said that California judges are routinely restricting the voting rights of adults with disabilities who are under limited conservatorships, also known as guardianships.

Judges are using literacy tests to determine if individuals should be allowed to vote in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the complaint alleges. What’s more, advocates say that court-appointed attorneys representing people with disabilities have been instructed by judges that individuals under limited conservatorships cannot receive assistance in completing voter registration forms or ballots.

“What is happening in Los Angeles is the tip of the iceberg,” said attorney Thomas F. Coleman, who filed the complaint. “The problem of voting rights violations of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities is not isolated to Los Angeles. Such civil rights violations are occurring elsewhere in California. Indeed, this is happening in many states throughout the nation.”

Parents often seek legal authority to continue making medical, financial and other decisions for individuals with developmental disabilities after they turn 18. Coleman’s group acted after hearing from Teresa Thompson who was dismayed that her effort to do just that could leave her son Stephen, now 20, without the right to vote.

“The court appointed an attorney to represent Stephen in the conservatorship process. This attorney told me that it would be inconsistent with the concept of conservatorship for Stephen to have the right to vote,” Thompson said. “I had no idea that by seeking a conservatorship for him that I would cause him to lose the right to vote.”

An audit by the Disability and Abuse Project of 61 recent cases in Los Angeles found that 90 percent of the estimated 10,000 people in the area with conservators may be disqualified from voting.

The advocacy group is asking the Justice Department to step in with legal action, if necessary, to ensure that people with disabilities are not disenfranchised.

More in Politics »

Search Jobs

Post a Comment

Disability Scoop welcomes comments, though only a selection are published. In determining which comments will appear beneath a story, we look for submissions that are thoughtful and add new ideas or perspective to the issues addressed within the story. Please keep your remarks brief and refrain from inserting links.

Comments (7 Responses)

  1. Becki says:

    When we sought conservatorship for our daughter, we specifically requested that she retain the right to vote. The judge granted this without hesitation. In fact, she registered to vote yesterday!

  2. Thomas C. Wood says:

    As an Autistic with Cerebral Palsy I have been voting since 1976 here in New Hampshire. I am an Aspie, and I have known about and understood the issues regarding politics since childhood. I will be very enraged, if in November this year of 2014, my “right to vote” has bee “taken away from me”.

  3. Carol Harris says:

    I registered my son and signed him up for absentee ballots. This way we don’t have to navigate the polling place that may not be accessible.

  4. Erna says:

    As Becki states, conservatorship/guardianship can coexist with voting rights if one specifically requests that this be retained. But in all objectivity, although intellectual disabilities sit on a spectrum, and a good number are able to function semi-independently, there are those for whom, retaining the right to vote makes little sense if they, as citizens, are unable to consider or debate the pros and cons of choices presumed to be theirs at the ballot, when they are unable to choose a breakfast cereal. However, negating the right to vote of a physically disabled person without significant intellectual disability, is indeed in my opinion, a violation of their rights and unacceptable, notwithstanding their need for conservatorship. These are personal opinions and I express them freely. There are those who may not agree and I respect that.

  5. Erin says:

    Presume competence.That is all.

  6. D. Riepl says:

    Those individuals who have an intellectual disability and need a guardian must be protected
    against predatory people who seek to steal their vote with deceptive practices. In the past few
    voting cycles, there have been many reports of incidents where this has occurred. This Bill is a
    protection of this individual’s safety.

  7. Frank Martino says:

    The issue of people with a certain levels of Intellectual Disablity voting has a practical issue.
    In the residences that I am familer with lot of the people are illiterate and I’m not sure they would have a clue
    about the physical act of voting. So they would need hand over hand assitance to vote.
    The problem is who gets to help? And how do we isnsure that the disabled person is actually picking who they want to vote for? In other words there is to much risk of staff/gaurdians minipulating the person with ID into voting a certain way.

Copyright © 2008-2015 Disability Scoop, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Reprints and Permissions